In the present work study is carried out for the behavior of G + 10 storied RC buildings with Rectangular shaped plan of soft storey at different levels. Floor height provided as 3.4m and also properties are defined for the irregular R.C building modelled in STAAD. Pro V8i software. Here twelve models are created in which soft storey is provided at ground, fifth and eleventh storey in all four seismic zones. From result it is found that Location of Soft storey effects seismic behavior of building in every zone from low to high seismicity. As the location of soft storey goes upper it gives more stable structure compared to soft storey at ground level. Soft storey at top level of structure is more stable than soft storey at middle part of structure, soft storey at top level gives Lower values of displacement in all seismic zones.
Introduction
The study focuses on the seismic behavior of multi-storey buildings with soft storeys—floors intentionally designed with reduced stiffness or strength, often for functional needs like parking or commercial use. Such soft storeys are critical because they tend to cause structural vulnerability during earthquakes, primarily due to increased lateral displacement and storey drift.
Building codes address irregularities like soft storeys mainly via stiffness contrasts between floors, but displacement-based criteria are considered more effective. The literature review highlights various research studies on seismic response of buildings with vertical irregularities—mass, stiffness, and soft storeys—using methods like Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA) and static analysis.
Key findings across multiple studies include:
Irregular buildings, especially those with soft or weak storeys, generally perform worse under seismic loads than regular, symmetrical buildings.
Mass irregularity often increases base shear forces, while stiffness irregularity can lead to higher inter-storey drifts.
Soft storeys exhibit maximum displacement and storey drift at their level, causing potential failure points.
Adding elements like shear walls or infill walls improves stability and reduces displacement.
Dynamic (response spectrum or time-history) analyses provide better performance predictions than static methods.
The study’s methodology involves modeling a G+10 reinforced concrete building with soft storeys at different levels across four seismic zones using STAAD.Pro software. Material properties, load combinations (gravity, seismic), and building parameters (dimensions, loads, damping) follow Indian standards (IS codes). Equivalent static seismic analysis was conducted to evaluate axial forces, bending moments, storey drift, and displacements.
Results show variations in axial force, moment, and displacement depending on the soft storey location and seismic zone, confirming the adverse impact of soft storeys on building seismic performance.
Conclusion
1) Soft storey at top level gives Lower values of displacement in all seismic zones
2) soft storey at upper floor level gives gives lowest values of Axial forces and bending moment in low and moderate seismic zone, while gives a slight higher values of moments in severe and very severe seismic zones compared to soft storey located at middle floor level